OBSERVATIONS ON THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF GEO NO. 34/2009 REGARDING THE 2009 BUDGET RECTIFICATION AND THE REGULATION OF SOME FINANCIAL-FISCAL MEASURES AND THE NEGATIVE INFLUENCES ON SMALL AND MEDIUM-SEIZED ENTERPRISES (SMES)

Lucian Chiriac and Ximena Moldovan ()

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2009, vol. 38, 59-70

Abstract: Considering the great number of taxes that Romania has presented by this time, the highest in Europe and the fourth place in the world, the European Commission considered that this is the greatest number of existing taxes in Europe, requiring motivated the reduction of their numbers, with the purpose of combating bureaucracy and promoting a business environment. The large number of taxes, the bushy law in this matter will not help, for sure, Romania find its way out of this present economic crisis. Regarding SMES, by the Article 157 in the Treaty of Establishing the European Communities, there has been created the necessary legal support for the promotion and development of this kind of enterprises in the European business environment. Hence, it is obvious that European bodies headed along the time to the encouragement and support for starting this kind of enterprises, for promoting the trade and economic cooperation between them, and last but not least, to ensure a legal framework for competitiveness in a united European economy. Consequently, the European Union imposed the adoption of some strategies at the Community level and a subsidiary national one, thing that would determine the Member States to lay at its fiscal and regulatory policy basis in this domain a compulsory and overriding principle “Think small first”.

Keywords: taxes; fiscal policy; budget rectification; small and medium seized enterprises (SMES). (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... 9/recjurid093_5F.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:38:y:2009:p:59-70

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).