SOME CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PRINCIPLE OF THE UNIQUENESS OF FISCAL CONTROL

Florin Tudor
Additional contact information
Florin Tudor: PhD., assistant professor, Faculty of Law - „Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Romania

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2009, vol. 38, 99-106

Abstract: By means of pertinent solutions and annotations, the scholarly literature has drawn attention to the possible danger of the wrongful implementation of the provisions of art.216 paragraph 3 of the Fiscal Procedure Code, as it’s increasingly becoming a common practice of the NAFA competent fiscal authorities to abrogate fiscal acts and to issue another fiscal administrative act. Advantages can be thus created for the subordinate observing fiscal bodies, proportional with the opponent debtor, due to the recommendations of the jurisdictional resolution body by motivating the decision itself. This way we consider that the main procedural principle is being broken, the principle according to which the fiscal inspection is carried out one time only for each tax, tariff, contribution and other sums due to the general consolidated budget and for each time interval subject to taxation. The article at hand sets off to analyse all aspects related to repetitive examinations directed by NAFA and to the breaking of the principle of uniqueness of the fiscal control. Without being exhaustive on the topic, we wish to accelerate and level the process of implementation of the fiscal law, extremely useful for putting into practice the principle of the public trust in the fiscal administration.

Keywords: fiscal taxation; fiscal administrative action; debt security uniqueness of fiscal control; fiscal contest. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... 9/recjurid093_8F.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:38:y:2009:p:99-106

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).