THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE REGULATION OF CRIMES AND PENALTIES BY EMERGENCY ORDINANCES

Lucian Chiriac and Daniela Valea ()

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2009, vol. 39, 91-97

Abstract: This survey proposes a theme that is exciting in a formula that is not proper to the countries with a rigid written constitution. It is noted, not infrequently, that the spirit and moreover the letter of the constitution is interpreted in the way the text of the fundamental act becomes permissive according to the will of that who interprets it for its own use or power. The authors ask themselves – where is the extent to which, in case of rigid constitutions one can provide an extensive interpretation?

Keywords: emergency ordinances; crimes; legislative delegation; organic law; ordinary law. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... 09/recjurid094_7.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:39:y:2009:p:91-97

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).