EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

ALTERNATIVE JUDICIAL PROCEDURES FOR DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE REGULATION OF THE NEW CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

George Magureanu and Florea Magureanu
Additional contact information
George Magureanu: Lecturer, Ph.D, Romanian-American University, ROMANIA.
Florea Magureanu: Professor, PhD, Romanian-American University, ROMANIA.

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2013, vol. 54, 71-83

Abstract: The celerity and efficiency crisis has been visible particularly in commercial law. The negative effects of this poor condition of commercial law are more visible in countries of the Central and Eastern Europe, where the above-mentioned aspect and the inappropriate specialization of the judicial staff, the unsatisfactory condition of logistics and especially the judicial procedures with a high degree of formalism fully affect the inefficiency of justice and prevent the population from trusting it. The judicial procedure of common law is extremely difficult, takes much time and has become increasingly expensive due to numerous taxes and fees, although the law giver makes efforts to reduce such drawbacks by entry into force of the new Code of civil procedure. Consequently, the settlement of disputes where the subjects of legal relations wish a simplified procedure and the recovery of certain, liquid and payable debts as soon as possible, through a much faster and less costly procedure, has become a must which is also acknowledged by the new regulation of the Code of civil procedure.

Keywords: Creditor; debtor; celerity; payment order procedure; certain; liquid and payable debt; low value requests. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... /recjurid133_10F.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:54:y:2013:p:71-83

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:54:y:2013:p:71-83