TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN ARBITRATION

Ioan Schiau
Additional contact information
Ioan Schiau: Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law of Transilvania University, Brasov, ROMANIA.

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2015, vol. 60, 149-157

Abstract: If arbitration is to be regarded as a swift dispute resolution instrument, then the difference between the state courts procedure and the arbitral procedure must reside, primarily, in a more effective and speedier way of taking evidence, since taking evidence is the most time consuming of all the phases of a litigation. This paper examines the extent to which the Romanian Lawmaker have met such requirements of taking evidence, when providing new arbitration rules in the recently adopted Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords: Arbitration; Evidence; Arbitration Rules; Disclosure of Documents (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... /recjurid151_12F.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:60:y:2015:p:149-157

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).