CRITICAL REMARKS ON THE ART. 594 PARA. 2 AND 3 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Brindusa Vartolomei
Additional contact information
Brindusa Vartolomei: Assistant Professor, Phd, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, ROMANIA

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2015, vol. 60, 176-181

Abstract: While highlighting the novelty of character by the separate plea for annulment of certain categories of conclusion rendered by the arbitral tribunal, the study is criticizing the superficial references, void or unfounded, that the art. 594 of the Code of Civil Procedure has on the regime of the aforementioned separate pleas for annulment by refering to others provisions of Book IV of the Code of Civil Procedure

Keywords: Action for annulment; separate action for annulment; pleas for annulment; conclusion of the arbitral tribunal attack. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... /recjurid151_14F.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:60:y:2015:p:176-181

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).