THE RIGHT OF THE WITNESS TO REMAIN SILENT – A PROCEDURAL GUARANTEE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION

Reka-Kinga Magyarosi
Additional contact information
Reka-Kinga Magyarosi: Master student at "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Faculty of Economics and Law, ROMANIA.

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2022, vol. 91, 82-87

Abstract: The testimony of the witness is among the most common pieces of evidence in criminal proceedings. Although scientific evolution has considerably expanded the field of evidence, the deposition is and will remain essential to justice, as the direct human perception of the events contributes to the reconstruction of the fact, and during the hearings decisive and even previously unknown information or details can be discovered. Due to the frequency with which this evidence is used, the institution of the witness must enjoy a comprehensive regulation that gives it adequate protection. As a rule, the witness is called before the judicial bodies to give statements, which is why in the past it was not admissible a refusal on his part to report on the facts in connection with which he was summoned. If the witness had some information that could have prejudiced him in the sense of self-incrimination, he was put in front of an impossible situation to tell the truth thus contributing to his own incrimination, or to commit the crime of perjury. Of course, this situation goes against some basic principles in criminal procedural matters, an aspect that led to a regulation of the witness's right to remain silent and not self-incriminate, which was enshrined in most legal systems.

Keywords: evidence; witness; deposition; right to remain silent; self-incrimination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... 2/recjurid224_8F.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:91:y:2022:p:82-87

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).