EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

THE ROLE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN ORGANIZATIONS

Ramin Bashir Khodaparasti ()
Additional contact information
Ramin Bashir Khodaparasti: Universitatea “Petru Maior” din Tîrgu–Mures Str. Nicolae Iorga, nr.1, Tîrgu – Mures, MURES, 540088, România)

STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS PETRU MAIOR SERIES OECONOMICA, 2012, vol. 1/2012, 39-52

Abstract: Development of organization started in period with agriculture and industrial during the period came and information. Today in period of competition, information is very important needed. So competitive advantage in the information provided to achieve goals is necessary. Entrance of this technology in organizations conjectural attitude changed and evolved functions their managers. The purpose of this paper is to define the correct information and the role technology has in improving the situation of organizations such as, workforce planning, increased efficiency and effectiveness of managers in organizations.

Keywords: Information technology; advantage competition; efficiency; strategic management. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D80 D85 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... economica1201_03.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:oecono:v:1/2012:y:2012:p:39-52

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS PETRU MAIOR SERIES OECONOMICA from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:pmu:oecono:v:1/2012:y:2012:p:39-52