Hiding Behind the Hypothetical: The Unjustifiability of Torture

Richard H. Corrigan

E-LOGOS, 2008, vol. 2008, issue 1, No 114

Abstract: In this paper I argue that interrogational torture is never morally justifiable. I highlight the many flaws inherent in using 'ticking-bomb' scenarios to justify the legalisation of torture in 'exceptional' circumstances. I argue that the damage that would be done to the ethical foundations of the state and the sanctity of the person should be sufficient to deter us from assuming that torture is ever morally permissible, or should be officially sanctioned. I further contend that the traditional scenarios used to justify arguments for the moral acceptability of torture suffer from the dual deficiency of abstraction and idealisation, and that lesser evil arguments are not sufficiently convincing when viewed in the light of the greater consequences of legalising brutality.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://elogos.vse.cz/artkey/elg-200801-0022.php (text/html)
http://elogos.vse.cz/pdfs/elg/2008/01/22.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2008:y:2008:i:1:id:114

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Katedra filosofie, Národohospodářská fakulta, Vysoká škole ekonomická v Praze, Nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3, Česká republika
http://elogos.vse.cz

Access Statistics for this article

E-LOGOS is currently edited by Miroslav Vacura

More articles in E-LOGOS from Prague University of Economics and Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stanislav Vojir ().