EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Godel on the mathematician's mind and Turing Machine

Inês Hipólito

E-LOGOS, 2014, vol. 2014, issue 1, 11 pages

Abstract: Godel's incompleteness theorems are categorically among the most philosophically important logico-mathematical discoveries ever made not only to Mathematics an logics, but also to Philosophy. Godel's incompleteness theorems can be applied to demonstrate that the human mind overtakes any mechanism or formal system. Anti-mechanism theses from the incompleteness theorems were presented in Godel's Proof by Nagel and Newman (1958). Subsequently, J. R. Lucas (1961) claimed that Godel's incompleteness theorem "proves that mechanism is false, that is, that minds cannot be explained as machines". Furthermore, given any machine which is consistent and capable of doing simple arithmetic, there is a formula it is incapable of producing as being true ...but which we can see to be true" (1961). Moreover, "if the proof of the falsity of mechanism is valid, it is of the greatest consequence for the whole of philosophy" (1961). More recently, a similar claim has been made by Roger Penrose (1990, 1994) and by Crispin Wright (1994, 1995) in an intuitionist perspective. Generally speaking, all of these support that Godel's theorems imply, without qualifications, that the human mind infinitely surpasses the power of any finite machine. In the light of these thesis, I would like to consider Godel's own perspective on an anti-mechanical thesis. Would Godel support a thesis that the mathematician mind could be a Turing Machine? What did Godel think that his theorem implied about the mathematician mind? I will start this discussion with a short review on Lucas and Penrose's arguments, and subsequently I will explore Godel's own considerations on the disjunction between mathematicians' mind and Turing machines.

Keywords: Godel; Turing machine (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.408.html (text/html)
http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.408.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:id:408:p:1-11

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Katedra filosofie, Národohospodářská fakulta, Vysoká škole ekonomická v Praze, Nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3, Česká republika
http://elogos.vse.cz

DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.408

Access Statistics for this article

E-LOGOS is currently edited by Miroslav Vacura

More articles in E-LOGOS from Prague University of Economics and Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stanislav Vojir ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:id:408:p:1-11