Economics at your fingertips  


Kritika některých aspektů díla K. R. Poppera ve vztahu k demarkačnímu problému

Petr Jedlička

E-LOGOS, 2016, vol. 2016, issue 1, 25-45

Abstract: The opening section briefly examines Popper's theory of demarcation and his views on inductive methods, the role of metaphysics in science, and falsification. Upon publication the work of this Viennese philosopher met a wide range of reactions, from partial modifications to proposals of new theories inspired by his work to complete dismissal. The main lines of critical argument against Popper's doctrine will be outlined here: I will argue that his complete rejection of inductive methodology is unjustified and will call for its partial acceptance in science. I will also challenge the shortcomings of Popper's idea of falsifiability and his demarcation criterion, the limited suitability of which will be demonstrated with typical examples of "pseudoscience" such as psychoanalysis and astrology. The last section proposes a moderate approach in the induction-deduction debate. In closing I will assess the practical value of Popper's theories in today's science.

Keywords: Demarcation problem; Karl Popper; falsifiability; inductive methods; pseudoscience; demarkační problém; falzifikovatelnost; induktivní metody; pseudověda (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (text/html) (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Katedra filosofie, Národohospodářská fakulta, Vysoká škole ekonomická v Praze, Nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3, Česká republika

DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.429

Access Statistics for this article

E-LOGOS is currently edited by Miroslav Vacura

More articles in E-LOGOS from Prague University of Economics and Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stanislav Vojir ().

Page updated 2021-05-04
Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2016:y:2016:i:1:id:429:p:25-45