Être et avoir. Patrimoine versus capital: le cas de l'agriculture

Denis Barthélémy

Économie rurale, 2000, vol. 260, issue 1, 26-40

Abstract: [eng] BEING AND HAVING . PATRIMONY VERSUS CAPITAL IN AGRICULTURE . The legal organisation of the farm may be viewed as the relative movement of two institutions: the firm (ensuring the growth of a capital) and the family (presiding over a patrimony designed to secure its long-term survival). An analysis of the farm lease legal regulations, of the policy with regard to farm structure and farm entry, and of the operating principles of the CAP, reveals the emergence of a capital rationality in contrast to the pre-existing patrimonial logic, accompanied by the submission of the firm to a patrimonial finality. This research brings out the lack of consistency characterising the concept of patrimony in economic analysis, echoing its individualising reduction at the level of legal concept. [fre] FRE: Droit rural! PAC! Entreprise ! Famille ! Capital ! Patrimoine

Date: 2000
Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.2000.1108
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2000.1108 (text/html)
https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_260_1_1108 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_260_1_1108

Access Statistics for this article

Économie rurale is currently edited by Société française d'économie rurale

More articles in Économie rurale from Programme National Persée
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Equipe PERSEE ().