Enhancing Bawaslu’s investigative authority in electoral crime enforcement

Herman Balla (), Wiwin Wiwin (), Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril (), Phireri Phireri (), Sunardi Purwanda () and Yuspita Syawaliah ()
Additional contact information
Herman Balla: Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada, Parepare-Indonesia
Wiwin Wiwin: Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril: Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
Phireri Phireri: Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
Sunardi Purwanda: Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
Yuspita Syawaliah: Faculty of Law, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada

Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 2026, vol. 6, issue 6, 248-258

Abstract: This study examines the urgency of expanding the investigative authority over electoral crimes to the Election Supervisory Body or Badan Pengawas Pemilu (Bawaslu) in response to the persistent ineffectiveness of the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu). This ineffectiveness is reflected in the high rate of case dismissals due to insufficient evidence and institutional discrepancies in legal interpretation, ultimately undermining the realization of electoral justice. This study adopts a normative (doctrinal) legal approach, employing statutory, conceptual, and case-based analyses. The data were analyzed qualitatively using descriptive, evaluative, and prescriptive methods. The findings demonstrate that expanding Bawaslu’s investigative authority is a philosophical, sociological, and juridical imperative. From a philosophical and sociological perspective, strengthening Bawaslu’s role is essential to ensure electoral justice and enhance public accountability, supported by the institution’s substantive expertise in electoral matters and a relatively high degree of public trust. Juridically, the Indonesian legal system provides a basis for granting investigative powers to Bawaslu’s Civil Servant Investigators or Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) through an integrated law enforcement framework and the application of meritocratic principles, in line with existing practices in handling special criminal offences. This study recommends that such authority be explicitly regulated (expressis verbis) within electoral legislation through an omnibus law. Furthermore, it proposes a distribution of powers model in which the National Bawaslu is granted authority over national elections, while the Provincial and Regency/City Bawaslu oversee local elections under the coordination of the Indonesian National Police. This framework is expected to provide a legal policy solution for achieving a more effective and efficient system of electoral law enforcement in Indonesia.

Keywords: Bawaslu; electoral crimes; investigation; Gakkumdu; electoral justice; civil servant investigators (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journal.privietlab.org/download.php?id=13353 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:prv:pssjpv:1896

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://journal.priv ... SJ/article/view/1896

DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1896

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Priviet Social Sciences Journal from Privietlab Research Center
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mochammad Fahlevi ().