Economic development, technical change and income distribution: A conversation between Keynesians, Schumpeterians and Structuralists. Introduction to the Special Issue
Alberto Botta (),
Gabriel Porcile () and
Rafael Ribeiro ()
PSL Quarterly Review, 2018, vol. 71, issue 285, 97-101
The original â€˜manifestoâ€™ that gave rise to the Structuralist development theory was written for the Economic Commission of Latin America (ECLA, subsequently ECLAC, after incorporating the Caribbean States in 1984) by Raul Prebisch (1949). This work had a strong impact on both the theoretical and policy debates and served as a rationale for the efforts at structural change and industrialization that many developing countries adopted in the following decades. By and large, the Latin American Structuralist tradition focuses on how the external constraint disproportionately affects output growth and domestic policies in less developed economies. The existence of bottlenecks in the productive system and labor market dualism characterizing peripheral economies opens space for state intervention and industrial policies as a way to promote structural transformation and economic development.
Keywords: economic development; technical change; income distribution; Latin America (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:psl:pslqrr:2018:20
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
PSL Quarterly Review is currently edited by Alessandro Roncaglia and Carlo D'Ippoliti
More articles in PSL Quarterly Review from Economia civile
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carlo D'Ippoliti ().