Angus Deaton ()
QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, 2005, issue 1
Although we have more data than ever before at our disposal, measuring poverty remains a controversial issue. This paper discusses the ambiguity that arises from using different definitions and data sources in world poverty measurement. It opens with a critical review of the different procedures to establish poverty lines and the various measures of poverty level, including the headcount ratio, poverty gap and capabilities approach. It then goes on to examine the issues involved in measuring world poverty, with reference both to the difficulty of comparing poverty between different countries and the use of representative household surveys versus national accounts for poverty measurement. Although significant differences exist, the general evidence shows that, apart from India and China, poverty in the world is getting worse; but it is also true that nearly half of the world’s population live in places where poverty levels are falling.
Keywords: Poverty; Politics; Poverty Lines; PPP Exchange Rates; Health (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I32 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Riviste. ... &Tipo=Articolo%20PDF (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Measuring poverty (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rar:journl:0012
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria from Associazione Rossi Doria Via Silvio d'Amico 77, - 00145 Rome Italy. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .