Cost-Benefit Analysis and Incentives In Evaluation: Some Comments
Paolo Leon
QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, 2008, issue 3
Abstract:
This book of essays “Cost- Benefit Analysis and Incentives in Evaluation” edited by Massimo Florio has a twofold objective. While it explicitly focuses on the reduction of moral hazard on the part of the European Union member states in using cost-benefit analysis (CBA), and in doing so proposes application of the incentive policy (à la Laffont and Tirole), it also investigates the reasons why CBA is declining as an evaluation tool. The decline is due to the entry onto the economic policy scene of monetarism as expounded by Friedman and, later, Barro, Lucas, Kydland and Prescott, with their critique of any type of public intervention. The authors rediscover the reasons for economic CBA evaluation, particularly for infrastructure projects (but it can readily be extended to environmental, education, cultural, research and innovation projects). Under scrutiny are concepts such as the discount rate, income distribution and the social welfare function.
Keywords: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Environmental Economics: Government Policy; Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 H43 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Riviste. ... 296&Tipo=ArticoloPDF (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rar:journl:0087
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria from Associazione Rossi Doria Via Silvio d'Amico 77, - 00145 Rome Italy. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by (qa@rossidoria.it this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).