Multifunctionality and Rural Development in Africa: An Evaluation at the Household Level

Filippo Arfini and Fabio Landini ()

QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, 2009, issue 2

Abstract: This work offers an interpretation of the role that multifunctionality plays in the policies that sustain rural development. Assuming as a reference the livelihood approach, we analyse multifunctionality within a framework which differs from the usual Wto negotiations. We reappraise its significance as a variable that reinforces the livelihood strategies of the rural households. In terms of policy design we analyse the costs of the secondary services and the variables that allow for their reduction. A quantitative evaluation is then carried out on the basis of an LP model taking a multifunctional farm in Africa. The results obtained are that: multifunctionality is very costly; most of the private costs of multifunctionality are due to constraints on specialisation in production; both coupled and de-coupled payment sustain multifunctionality but in different ways; technological progress is a key variable for economic sustainability.

Keywords: Multifunctionality; Rural Development; Livelihood Approach; Linear Programming (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C02 Q01 Q12 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Riviste. ... &Tipo=Articolo%20PDF (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rar:journl:0108

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria from Associazione Rossi Doria Via Silvio d'Amico 77, - 00145 Rome Italy. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).