The First Globalization Debate: Crusoe vs. Gulliver

Craufurd Goodwin

QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, 2011, issue 3

Abstract: Two of the earliest novels in English, Robinson Crusoe (1719) by Daniel Defoe and Gulliver’s Travels (1726) by Jonathan Swift, are widely perceived as an entertaining adventure story and a pioneering work of science fiction. Viewed by modern economists, however, they appear as expressions of opposing positions on the desirability of integration within a world economy. Crusoe demonstrated the gains from trade and colonization and the attendant social and political benefits. By contrast, Swift warned of complex entanglements that would arise from globalization, especially with foreign leaders who operated from theory and models rather than common sense.

Keywords: Daniel Defoe; Jonathan Swift; Robinson Crusoe; Gulliver’s Travels; Globalization debate; International trade; Colonies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B11 B31 F02 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.asp?idRivista=25 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rar:journl:0221

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria from Associazione Rossi Doria Via Silvio d'Amico 77, - 00145 Rome Italy. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).