EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A SHORT CRITIQUE OF PERFECT COMPETITION MODEL FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AUSTRIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS

Andreas Stamate and Radu Muşetescu ()
Additional contact information
Radu Muşetescu: Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies

Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Radu Cristian Musetescu ()

Romanian Economic Business Review, 2011, vol. 6, issue 4, 112-122

Abstract: The perfect competition model is not the only model which we can use in analyzing the markets.Although it is quite clear that competition laws are based on it, there are not sufficient reasons to confirm its suitability for this enterprise. We raise the question of realism implied in concepts like ‘homogeneous products’ and ‘numerous participants’, and then we try to portrait the world as it is stated in the perfect neoclassical model. The discussion has powerful insights given by the Austrian methodology which in time proved to be a strong and efficient competitor for the neoclassical paradigm. The perfect competition model is opposed to free competition model, or the competition unhampered by any violent restrictions imposed to entrepreneurs in the process of satisfying the consumers.

Keywords: perfect competition; economic calculation; money; prices; uncertainty; profits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/WI11/REBE-WI11-A11.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:4:p:112-122

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Romanian Economic Business Review from Romanian-American University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alex Tabusca ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2011:i:4:p:112-122