How Have Australian Banks Responded to Tighter Capital and Liquidity Requirements?

Tim Atkin and Belinda Cheung
Additional contact information
Tim Atkin: Reserve Bank of Australia

RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued), 2017, 41-50

Abstract: Australian banks have responded to tighter regulatory requirements for capital and liquidity over the past decade, which has strengthened their resilience to adverse shocks. While banks are now in a much better position to deal with these types of shocks, this strengthening has also had implications for their funding costs and some key profitability metrics. This article outlines some of the main changes to banks' activities as they have responded to the tighter capital and liquidity requirements.

Keywords: capital; liquidity; banks; regulation; australian banks; major banks; return on equity; funding costs; interest rates (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2017/ ... ity-requirements.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rba:rbabul:jun2017-05

Access Statistics for this article

RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued) is currently edited by Luci Ellis

More articles in RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued) from Reserve Bank of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paula Drew ().