The French Depression in the 1930s
Paul Beaudry and
Franck Portier ()
Review of Economic Dynamics, 2002, vol. 5, issue 1, 73-99
Abstract:
This paper show that, first, in contradiction with the conventional view regarding the French depression, there are more similarities than differences between the French and U.S. episodes in the 1930s, which suggests the need for an explanation with a similar cause; second, technological change (regression or stagnation) is neither sufficient nor necessary to account for the French Depression; third, institutional and market regulation changes provide an explanation that is quantitatively plausible, but the causes of those changes are still to be explained. (Copyright: Elsevier)
Keywords: France; depression; growth accounting; technological change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E30 N14 N44 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/redy.2001.0143 Full text (application/pdf)
Access to full texts is restricted to ScienceDirect subscribers and ScienceDirect institutional members. See http://www.sciencedirect.com/ for details.
Related works:
Working Paper: Data Appendix to The French Depression in the 1930s (2002) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:red:issued:v:5:y:2002:i:1:p:73-99
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.economic ... ription-information/
DOI: 10.1006/redy.2001.0143
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Economic Dynamics is currently edited by Loukas Karabarbounis
More articles in Review of Economic Dynamics from Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christian Zimmermann ().