Dilemas de un teórico económico

Ariel Rubinstein ()

Revista de Economía Institucional, 2006, vol. 8, issue 14, 191-213

Abstract: What on earth are economic theorists like me trying to accomplish? The paper discusses four dilemmas encountered by an economic theorist: i) the dilemma of absurd conclusions: should we abandon a model if it produces absurd conclusions or should we regard a model as a very limited set of assumptions which will inevitably fail in some contexts?; ii) the dilemma of responding to evidence: should our models be judged according to experimental results?; iii) the dilemma of model-less regularities: should models provide the hypothesis for testing or are they simply exercises in logic which have no use in identifying regularities?, and iv) the dilemma of relevance: do we have the right to offer advice or to make statements which are intended to influence the real world?

Keywords: dilemmas; economic theory; absurd conclusions; relevance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 A13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.uexternado.edu.co/facecono/ecoinstituci ... rs/arubinstein14.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rei:ecoins:v:8:y:2006:i:14:p:191-213

Access Statistics for this article

Revista de Economía Institucional is currently edited by Alberto Supelano

More articles in Revista de Economía Institucional from Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía Cra. 1 No. 12-68 Casa de las Mandolinas. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paola Rodríguez ().