Thinking about Bureaucracy: Mises versus Niskanen

Radu Şimandan

Romanian Economic Journal, 2009, vol. 12, issue 34, 85-96

Abstract: In this paper, I oppose the Misesian insight on the problem of bureaucracy to the theory of Niskanen. Assuming that bureaucracy is merely a symptom of a more serious disease – namely socialism – the Misesian perspective is an analysis of the economic, political, and psychological consequences of the incentives and constraints that bureaucrats face. Niskanen’s analysis focuses on the characteristics of the political environment in which bureaucrats act. Applying the Public Choice theory to the study of bureaucratic behavior, Niskanen shows that bureaucrats have a strong incentive to try to maximize the bureau’s budget.

Keywords: Austrian economics; Public Choice; public sector economics; bureaucracy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B25 D73 H83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech. ... 01/2137/simandan.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rej:journl:v:12:y:2009:i:34:p:85-96

Access Statistics for this article

Romanian Economic Journal is currently edited by Ioan Popa, PhD

More articles in Romanian Economic Journal from Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Radu Lupu ().