Size Distortion of Bootstrap Tests: an Example from Unit Root Testing

Russell Davidson

Review of Economic Analysis, 2010, vol. 2, issue 2, 169-193

Abstract: Testing for a unit root in a series obtained by summing a stationary MA(1) process with a parameter close to -1 leads to serious size distortions under the null, on account of the near cancellation of the unit root by the MA component in the driving stationary series. The situation is analysed from the point of view of bootstrap testing, and an exact quanti- tative account is given of the error in rejection probability of a bootstrap test. A particular method of estimating the MA parameter is recommended, as it leads to very little distortion even when the MA parameter is close to -1. A new bootstrap procedure with still better properties is proposed. While more computationally demanding than the usual bootstrap, it is much less so than the double bootstrap.

Keywords: Bootstrap test; unit root; MA(1); size distortion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C10 C12 C22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rofea.org/index.php?journal=journal&pag ... %5D=36&path%5B%5D=48 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ren:journl:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:169-193

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Economic Analysis is currently edited by Dr. Jerzy (Jurek) Konieczny

More articles in Review of Economic Analysis from Digital Initiatives at the University of Waterloo Library
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Jerzy (Jurek) Konieczny (editor@rofea.org).