A Perspective On Segment Reporting Choices And Segment Reconciliations
Dana Hollie and
Shaokun£¨Carol) Yu
Applied Finance and Accounting, 2015, vol. 1, issue 2, 88-95
Abstract:
In 2014, segment reporting gained third place in SEC comment letters. This article reviews the history of segment reporting including segment reporting choices and segment reconciliations, the current concerns as the level of detail in segment disclosures varies widely across organizations, the value relevance of segment reconciliations and its market consequences, and the importance of segment reporting to management. The following are highlights of the manuscript: The third-most-common area discussed in SEC comment letters: segment reporting. The application of SFAS131: the whole may not equal the sum of its parts. The level of detail in segment disclosures varies widely across organizations. Segment reconciliation adds value to consolidated earnings. Segment reconciliation can have significant market consequences. Additional guidance on segment reporting may be beneficial and necessary in the future.
Keywords: Segment Reporting; Segment Reconciliation; SFAS 131 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/afa/article/view/816/832 (application/pdf)
http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/afa/article/view/816 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rfa:afajnl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:88-95
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Applied Finance and Accounting from Redfame publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Redfame publishing ().