Empirical Comparison of Robust Portfolios’ Investment Effects
The Review of Finance and Banking, 2012, vol. 05, issue 1, 047-061
The purpose of this article is to assess whether correct application of robust estimators in construction of minimum variance portfolios' (MVP) allows to achieve better investment results in comparison with portfolios defined using classical MLE estimators. Theoretical robust portfolios properties and portfolios investment effect are compared. This paper proposes a practical methodology of comparing alternative estimation methods, based on random portfolio selection. This approach enables to analyse investment effects of various portfolios. The empirical analysis shows that for MVP portfolios with nonnegative constraints created using robust methods, there is no significant risk improvement, and that even for most robust methods, there is an observable significant risk increase compared to the risk of classical portfolios. This paper also shows that robust portfolio estimators cause higher transaction cost.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rfb.ase.ro/articole/ARTICLE_IV.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rfb:journl:v:05:y:2013:i:1:p:047-061
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Finance and Banking is currently edited by Victor Dragota; Bogdan Negrea
More articles in The Review of Finance and Banking from Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante Strada Mihai Eminescu nr.13-15, sector 1, Bucuresti, Romania. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tatu Lucian ().