Striking a Balance: Evaluating Credit Risk with Traditional and Machine Learning Models
Faraz Ahmed,
Kehkashan Nizam,
Zubair Sajid,
Sunain Qamar and
Ahsan
Additional contact information
Faraz Ahmed: PhD Scholar, Department of Business Administration, IQRA University, Karachi, Pakistan
Zubair Sajid: Lecturer, Department of Computer Science, IQRA University, Karachi, Pakistan
Sunain Qamar: MBA, Department of Management Sciences, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology University, Karachi, Pakistan
Ahsan: Lecturer, Department of Commerce, Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University, Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan
Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 2024, vol. 13, issue 3, 30-35
Abstract:
This research assesses machine learning models' validity, clarity, and equity, compared to classical models and especially logistic regression in credit risk evaluation. In the traditional model of data management, efficiency and the accuracy of information are challenges; an issue of machine learning models is model selection and multicollinearity. The study intends to help financial institutions establish the best strategy for their needs. Furthermore, it delves into the effect of heterogeneous data sources on the credit risk model using machine learning. The research analyses the implications of using machine learning in assessing credit risk. Interestingly, focusing on peer-to-peer lending platforms, the research aims to deal with the need for more attention to combining machine learning and traditional models in the literature. The deductive method is the application of inferential analyses, the Traditional model is logistic regression, and the Machine Learning model is a neural network (CNN model) based on secondary data from the Kaggle peer-to-peer lending dataset. With likely findings expected to comprise prediction of the probability of default and better availability of loans, risk analysis leads to formulated lending decisions managing a financial portfolio.
Keywords: Credit Risk; Credit Scoring; Machine Learning Model; Traditional Model; Default (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/942/995 (application/pdf)
https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/942 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:30-35
DOI: 10.61506/01.00425
Access Statistics for this article
Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE) is currently edited by Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani
More articles in Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE) from Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani ().