Trademarks and Geographical Indications: Policy Issues and Options in Trade Negotiations and Implementation
Additional contact information
Thitapha Wattanapruttipaisan: Asian Development Bank
Asian Development Review, 2009, vol. 26-1, issue 1, 166-205
Trademarks and geographical indications have been the focus of contention in bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations and in the implementation of agreed trade obligations and regulations among World Trade Organization members, including partners in free trade agreements with Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) members. This paper examines these issues, and the related policy implications and options, in terms of specifications and scope, priority rights and coexistence, and the treatment of generic names in the registration and protection of geographical indications. The development, commercialization, and protection of geographical indication products can benefit trade and development in ASEAN economies. However, a geographical indication system similar to that in the European Union would likely reduce ASEAN imports of competing products from non- European Union sources. An agenda for further research, policy facilitation, and information dissemination is mapped out, emphasizing the importance of adequate and affordable policy incentives and business development services.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:adbadr:2616
Access Statistics for this article
Asian Development Review is currently edited by Shang-Jin Wei
More articles in Asian Development Review from Asian Development Bank Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maria Susan M. Torres ().