The Effect of Traditional and Contemporary Management Accounting Practices on Organisational Outcomes and the Moderating Role of Strategy
Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu,
Kevin Baird and
Lu Jiao
Additional contact information
Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu: Macquarie University
Kevin Baird: Macquarie University
Lu Jiao: Macquarie University
American Business Review, 2023, vol. 26, issue 1, 95-121
Abstract:
This study examines the association between the use of a package of contemporary and a package of traditional management accounting practices with organisational outcomes (organisational performance and competitive advantage), and the moderating role of Miles and Snow’s (1978) strategic typologies on these relationships. Based on the responses from 505 US based financial managers, the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) results indicate that the extent of use of both contemporary and traditional management accounting practices is positively associated with organisational performance and competitive advantage. Furthermore, the findings indicate that with the exception of the reactor typology, Miles and Snow’s (1978) strategy typologies (i.e., defender, prospector, and analyser) moderate the association between the use of management accounting practices with the organisational outcomes. In particular, the findings indicate that the defender (prospector) strategy positively (negatively) moderates the association between the use of a package of traditional (contemporary) management accounting practices with organisational performance. In addition, the results indicate that the defender (analyser) strategy positively (negatively) moderates the association between the use of a package of contemporary management accounting practices with competitive advantage, while the defender (analyser) strategy negatively (positively) moderates the association between the use of a package of traditional management accounting practices with competitive advantage.
Keywords: Contemporary Management Accounting Practices; Traditional Management Accounting Practices; Package of Management Accounting Practices; Miles and Snow Strategy; Organisational Performance; Competitive Advantage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://digitalcommons.newhaven.edu/americanbusinessreview/vol26/iss1/6/ Full text (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:ambsrv:0073
Access Statistics for this article
American Business Review is currently edited by Kamal Upadhyaya and Subroto Roy
More articles in American Business Review from Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Amber Montano ().