EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Relevance of Demographic Similarity and Factuality in Social Influencer Communication Culture – A Comparison Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Conditions

Walter von Mettenheim and Klaus-Peter Wiedmann
Additional contact information
Walter von Mettenheim: Leibniz University of Hannover, Hanover, Germany
Klaus-Peter Wiedmann: Leibniz University of Hannover, Hanover, Germany

American Business Review, 2024, vol. 27, issue 2, 439-458

Abstract: This work identifies differences in the success factors of influencers given consumers’ consumption goals (hedonic vs. utilitarian). Although practitioners have complained about the lack of know-how regarding this issue, research on the topic remains scarce. Hypotheses on the differing relevance of the demographic similarity of influencers and consumers and of the factuality of influencers’ communication are verified through an empirical investigation. The scenario is consumers’ selection of a hotel for (1) a holiday (hedonic consumption goal) or (2) a professional/university seminar (utilitarian consumption goal). The results are analyzed by structural equation modeling and multigroup analysis. We generate some surprising results. Counterintuitively, demographic similarity is more important under utilitarian than hedonic conditions. Factuality seems equally important in both conditions. Explanations and implications of these findings are provided.

Keywords: Social Influencer Marketing; Hedonic Products; Utilitarian Products; Demographic Similarity; Factuality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 E21 J11 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://digitalcommons.newhaven.edu/americanbusinessreview/vol27/iss2/3/ Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:ambsrv:0110

Access Statistics for this article

American Business Review is currently edited by Kamal Upadhyaya and Subroto Roy

More articles in American Business Review from Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Amber Montano ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ris:ambsrv:0110