K-anonymity: A note on the trade-off between data utility and data security
Tatiana Komarova (),
Denis Nekipelov (),
Ahnaf Al Rafi () and
Additional contact information
Tatiana Komarova: London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
Denis Nekipelov: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, US
Ahnaf Al Rafi: London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
Applied Econometrics, 2017, vol. 48, 44-62
Researchers often use data from multiple datasets to conduct credible econometric and statistical analysis. The most reliable way to link entries across such datasets is to exploit unique identifiers if those are available. Such linkage however may result in privacy violations revealing sensitive information about some individuals in a sample. Thus, a data curator with concerns for individual privacy may choose to remove certain individual information from the private dataset they plan on releasing to researchers. The extent of individual information the data curator keeps in the private dataset can still allow a researcher to link the datasets, most likely with some errors, and usually results in a researcher having several feasible combined datasets. One conceptual framework a data curator may rely on is k-anonymity, k>=2, which gained wide popularity in computer science and statistical community. To ensure k-anonymity, the data curator releases only the amount of identifying information in the private dataset that guarantees that every entry in it can be linked to at least k different entries in the publicly available datasets the researcher will use. In this paper, we look at the data combination task and the estimation task from both perspectives – from the perspective of the researcher estimating the model and from the perspective of a data curator who restricts identifying information in the private dataset to make sure that k-anonymity holds. We illustrate how to construct identifiers in practice and use them to combine some entries across two datasets. We also provide an empirical illustration on how a data curator can ensure k-anonymity and consequences it has on the estimation procedure. Naturally, the utility of the combined data gets smaller as k increases, which is also evident from our empirical illustration.
Keywords: data protection; data combination; k-anonymity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C13 C14 C25 C35 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://pe.cemi.rssi.ru/pe_2017_48_044-062.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:apltrx:0330
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Econometrics is currently edited by Sergei Aivazian
More articles in Applied Econometrics from Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS"
Series data maintained by Anatoly Peresetsky ().