Veblen, Economic Policy and the Present Crisis

Paolo Ramazzotti

European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 2014, vol. 26, issue 1-2, 73-90

Abstract: The aim of the paper is to discuss Veblen’s views of how and why business requirements intrinsically contrast the livelihood of the community. It contends that, unfortunately, Veblen’s notion of pecuniary gain is either too restrictive or too broad to conceive of an economy that overcomes the profitability-serviceability dichotomy. A proper understanding of the dichotomy and of possible policies to contrast it has to situate it within capitalist market relations, where important social categories are turned into commodities despite their incompatibility with such a role. This typically Polanyian approach aims to conceive of a policy that acts on the degree of commodification of the economy and, in particular, of its fictitious commodities, thereby avoiding waverings between the forced acquiescence to the status quo and the millenarian expectation of an all-encompassing change.

Keywords: Veblen; K. Polanyi; commodification; crises; economic policy; prices; technology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 B15 B31 B52 G01 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ejess.revuesonline.com/article.jsp?articleId=19838 Full text (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Veblen, economic policy and the present crisis (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:ejessy:0011

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Economic and Social Systems is currently edited by Bernard Paulré and Stefano Lucarelli

More articles in European Journal of Economic and Social Systems from Lavoisier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stefano Lucarelli ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).