Desert and Distributive Efficiency

Teun J. Dekker ()
Additional contact information
Teun J. Dekker: University College Maastricht, Postal: Netherlands

Ethics and Economics, 2008, vol. 5, issue 2, 23

Abstract: It is highly desirable for an allocation of goods to be efficient. However, one might also deem it important that an allocation gives individuals what they deserve. This paper investigates whether it is possible for an allocation to be both efficient and give people what they deserve. It will first of all consider comparative desert, and conclude that it is possible to satisfy both desiderata. It will then consider absolute desert by integrating Shelly Kagan’s work on desert and economic theory. The conclusion will be that there are potential conflicts between absolute desert and efficiency. The paper will then examine how to select the best compromise between the two values, considering several different conceptions of absolute desert.

Keywords: Distributive Justice; Desert; Pareto Efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://ethique-economique.net Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:etheco:0021

Access Statistics for this article

Ethics and Economics is currently edited by Jérôme Ballet

More articles in Ethics and Economics from CREUM, Université de Montréal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by David Robichaud ().