How do institutions matter in the income-equalizing effect of mobile phone penetration?
Simplice Asongu
European Economic Letters, 2013, vol. 2, issue 2, 56-61
Abstract:
The object of this paper is to complement theoretical ‘mobile penetration’ literature with empirical evidence in a dual manner: on the one hand, assess the income-redistributive effect of mobile phone penetration and; on the other hand, the instrumentality of good governance in this nexus. Main findings suggest an equalizing income-redistributive effect, with a higher magnitude in the presence of government quality instruments. It follows that, good governance is a necessary condition for a higher income-equalizing effect of mobile phone penetration. The empirical evidence which deviates from mainstream country-specific and microeconomic survey-based approaches is on 52 African countries. ‘Mobile phone’-oriented poverty reduction channels are also discussed.
Keywords: Mobile Phones; Shadow Economy; Poverty; Inequality; Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E00 G20 I30 L96 O33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)
Downloads: (external link)
http://eelet.org.uk/EEL2(2)56-61.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: How do institutions matter in the income-equalizing effect of mobile phone penetration? (2013) 
Working Paper: How do institutions matter in the income-equalizing effect of mobile phone penetration? (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:eueclt:0015
Access Statistics for this article
European Economic Letters is currently edited by Mike Taylor
More articles in European Economic Letters from European Economics Letters Group
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mike taylor ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).