Why Is Open Regionalism Not Always Good?
Wai-Heng Loke () and
L. Winters
Additional contact information
Wai-Heng Loke: University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Postal: Division of Economics, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, 199 Taikang East Road, Ningbo, 315100, China
Journal of Economic Integration, 2012, vol. 27, 437-465
Abstract:
When the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) formally adopted the principle of “open regionalism” (OR) in its trade liberalization in 1991, many were optimistic that this approach suggested the bloc as a stepping stone toward global free trade. This optimistic view was reinforced by the economic theorizing of Sang-Seung Yi (1996). This paper shows formally via a simple model why OR may fail. We unpick Yi (1996) systematically and explain that OR works in his model because of quasilinear preferences and Ricardian technology assumptions. Once these assumptions are replaced with constant lasticity of substitution (CES) preferences and increasing marginal costs, OR fails to ensure global free trade as an equilibrium when the world consists of a country that is sufficiently larger than the rest of the world.
Keywords: Regional Integration; Equilibrium Coalition Structure; Welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F12 F13 F15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://sejong.metapress.com/ Full text (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:integr:0580
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Integration is currently edited by Seongeun Kim
More articles in Journal of Economic Integration from Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Yunhoe Kim ().