The bias in measuring disparity in outcomes via a dummy variable: A note

Shawn W. Ulrick ()
Additional contact information
Shawn W. Ulrick: U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Postal: 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20580, USA.

Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 2014, issue 3, 153-161

Abstract: Disparity in an outcome between two groups is often measured via the coefficient of a dummy variable in a regression that pools both groups. The dummy is interpreted as the disparity. A casual search of the literature in economics and other social sciences reviews far too many examples of this method to catalog. Unfortunately, if the impact of one (or more) of the control variables differs between the two groups, the measured disparity (i.e., the coefficient on the group dummy) will be biased. We illustrate and derive this bias. Given the bias, we believe that one is better running separate regressions for each group and then implementing decomposition methods or predicting adjusted gaps in outcome (i.e., predicting the but-for world that would exist if the two groups had identical characteristics).

Keywords: Pooling bias; measuring disparity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:iosjes:0018

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic and Social Measurement is currently edited by Charles G. Renfro

More articles in Journal of Economic and Social Measurement from IOS Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Saskia van Wijngaarden ().