 Financial stability in the Eurozone: where do we stand?Ivo Arnold () Journal of Financial Transformation, 2007, vol. 19, 65-79 Abstract: At the start of the EMU, concerns about fiscal and monetary stability dominated the academic debate. In contrast, financial stability issues were largely overlooked. Since then, more attention has been paid to the implications of the EMU for financial regulation and supervision and to the drawbacks of government involvement in the domestic financial sector, both as owner and as debtor. This paper reassesses these issues and draws the following conclusions. Firstly, little progress has been made in centralizing financial supervision in the Eurozone. Secondly, with the exception of Germany, all Eurozone countries have made substantial progress in reducing state ownership in their banking systems. Thirdly, limited progress has been made in the reduction of bank exposures to domestic public debt. A continued retreat of governments from the financial sector is desirable, leaving bank ownership to the private sector, holdings of government debt to the public, and supervision to a specialized, independent European institution. Keywords: European Monetary Union; fiscal and monetary stability; financial supervision (search for similar items in EconPapers) There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:jofitr:1401 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Financial Transformation is currently edited by Prof. Shahin Shojai More articles in Journal of Financial Transformation from Capco Institute 77 Water Street, 10th Floor, New York NY 10005. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.