Markets for CCPs and Regulation: Considering Unintended Consequences

Serge Wibaut () and D Sykes Wilford ()
Additional contact information
Serge Wibaut: Université Catholique de Louvain (Belgium)
D Sykes Wilford: The Citadel

Journal of Financial Transformation, 2012, vol. 34, 105-118

Abstract: Central clearing counterparties (CCPs) have become a cru- cial element of the financial architecture and as such they have lately attracted the attention of prudential authorities at the highest level emphasising their crucial, if not too well understood, role in the financial system, while also reflecting anxiety at imagining the possibility of a main clearing house failing during times of stress. Post Lehman directives and legislation, both in Europe and the U.S., have placed more emphasis on CCPs within the global financial system as a possible “fix” to derivatives related banking system risk. Many papers have argued for mutualisation of counter party risk, at various degrees, to better stave off another financial crisis, which may be driven, in particular, by derivatives trad- ing. In this paper issues related to regulation of this already heavily regulated industry are discussed in light of the in- surance industry literature, focusing on potential issues that may arise from various efforts to “solve counterparty prob- lems” with greater regulation or legislative directive. Raising concerns about the unintended consequences of particular forms of socialization or regulation of CCPs, the work intends to highlight possible side effects of centralized or monopoly (either from regulation or fiat) systems for counterparty clear- ing that may (will likely) lead to greater, not less, systematic risk in ways not foreseen in any potential legislation. To do so, the authors build several simple conceptual structures of markets for CCPs and discuss various profit maximiz- ing structures that may be taken by a CCP under different conditions with allusion to the insurance industry. What becomes clear from the discussion is that the various busi- ness models will lead to complexities not easily anticipated and understood due to the interactions of many different economic agents. Regulation, both existing and potential, quickly complicates the various business relationships that allow markets to function and various products and agents to interact at all levels. Simple solutions to the systematic is- sues raised by the financial crisis via regulation or legislation can have far from simple implications for the stability of the system as a whole.

Keywords: Central Clearing counter parties; CCPs; credence goods; regulation of derivatives; OTC Derivatives; Exchange Traded Derivatives; Dodd-Frank; Systemic Risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:jofitr:1510

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Transformation is currently edited by Prof. Shahin Shojai

More articles in Journal of Financial Transformation from Capco Institute 77 Water Street, 10th Floor, New York NY 10005.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Prof. Shahin Shojai ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).