Need for Uniform Rating Scales Across All Rating Agencies

Charumathi B () and Mangaiyarkarasi T
Additional contact information
Charumathi B: Department of Management Studies, School of Management, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India
Mangaiyarkarasi T: Business Administration Department, School of Management Studies, Vels University, Pallavaram, Chennai, India

Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 2017, vol. 22, issue 03, 01-20

Abstract: Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) play an important role in the financial markets and in India, they work along with the regulator in regulating the market. They are mentioned in many statutory regulations of SEBI, IRDA, RBI, NSIC etc. Corporate debt market in India has developed manifold over the last decade and regulators believe that CRAs credit assessment capabilities is a necessary input for obtaining quality rating. Entry of new agencies with good analytical abilities and fair competition will help in the growth of debt market. They are five registered rating agencies in India out of which few agencies hold the major market share. The rating given by the CRAs is on an ordinal scale denoted by a rating symbol. Each rating agencies rate debt instruments with different rating symbols and SEBI achieved standardization of rating symbols for debt instruments (includes mutual fund schemes and structured obligations) alone. There are other ratings that are yet to be standardized. Financial literacy is still in the nascent stage in India and uniform rating scale will help the investor community to better understand the repaying ability of the issuers. Moreover, for fair competition to emerge and for the benefit of all the investors it is important that the rating symbols are standardized. This paper deals with the need for standardization and perspective of the regulators (who influence the ratings market at the international level) regarding standardization of rating scale. It is also important to view the rating symbols of various rating agencies in a comparable scale to infer if there is any difference in their symbols and definition.

Keywords: IOSCO; SEC; ESMA; Standardization; Competition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.icommercecentral.com/open-access/need- ... encies.php?aid=86593 Full text (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:joibac:0135

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce is currently edited by Vijaya Lakshmi, Nahum Goldmann and Dale Pinto

More articles in Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dale Pinto ().