Metropolitan smart growth centers: An assessment of incentive policies in four regions
Richard D. Margerum (),
Susan Brody (),
Robert Parker () and
Gail McEwen ()
Additional contact information
Richard D. Margerum: University of Oregon, http://pppm.uoregon.edu/faculty/richmargerum
Susan Brody: Portland State University
Robert Parker: University of Oregon, Postal: 107 Hendricks Hall, Department of Planning, Public Policy, & Management, 1209 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, http://pages.uoregon.edu/rgp/
Gail McEwen: Portland State University, Postal: Portland State University, School of Government - Urban & Public Affairs , PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97207
The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2013, vol. 6, issue 2, 21-32
Across the United States, metropolitan areas face challenges related to transportation and land use. An emerging policy in many regions is to promote development around higher-density, mixed-use (smart-growth) centers that create locally accessible nodes; many of these nodes are also linked to transit stops. Some metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) have developed regional plans and incentive programs to encourage local governments to develop these centers. Incentives include grants as well as funding criteria in transportation improvement programs (TIP) that favor projects supporting centers. This paper assesses these policies as they have been applied in: (1) Puget Sound, Washington; (2) Portland, Oregon; (3) Denver, Colorado; and (4) San Diego, California. For the four regions we reviewed documents, conducted 40 interviews with key individuals, administered an online survey of 450 experts (response rate = 44 percent), and held a two-day forum involving 40 participants. We found that incentive policies by themselves were having a limited impact because they are new and offer small amounts of funding relative to local government needs and market forces. However, when incentives are combined with plans, policies, and transit investment, they provide a significant foundation for promoting growth around centers. There are a number of ways these policies can be improved, and many policies are transferable to other metropolitan regions.
Keywords: transportation; smart growth; metropolitan planning organizations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/257/337 Full text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:jtralu:0106
Access Statistics for this article
The Journal of Transport and Land Use is currently edited by David M. Levinson
More articles in The Journal of Transport and Land Use from Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Arlene Mathison ().