Economics at your fingertips  

The impact of weight matrices on parameter estimation and inference: A case study of binary response using land-use data

Yiyi Wang (), Kara M. Kockelman () and Xiaokun (Cara) Wang Xiaokun (Cara) Wang ()
Additional contact information
Yiyi Wang: Montana State University, Postal: Department of Civil Engineering, Montana State University, Cobleigh Hall,
Kara M. Kockelman: The University of Texas, Postal: Professor, and E.P. Schoch Professor in Engineering, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas, 1 University Station (Mail Code C1761), Austin, TX 78712-1076,
Xiaokun (Cara) Wang Xiaokun (Cara) Wang: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Postal: JEC 4049 4th Fl Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 110 8th Street, Troy, NY, 12180,

The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2013, vol. 6, issue 3, 75-85

Abstract: This paper develops two new models and evaluates the impact of using different weight matrices on parameter estimates and inference in three distinct spatial specifications for discrete response. These specifications rely on a conventional, sparse, inverse-distance weight matrix for a spatial autoregressive probit (SARP) model, a spatial autoregressive approach where the weight matrix includes an endogenous distance-decay parameter (SARPα), and a matrix exponential spatial specification for probit (MESSP). These are applied in a binary choice setting using both simulated data and parcel-level land-use data. Parameters of all models are estimated using Bayesian methods. In simulated tests, adding a distance-decay parameter term to the spatial weight matrix improved the quality of estimation and inference, as reflected by a lower deviance information criteriaon (DIC) value, but the added sampling loop required to estimate the distance-decay parameter substantially increased computing times. In contrast, the MESSP model’s obvious advantage is its fast computing time, thanks to elimination of a log-determinant calculation for the weight matrix. In the model tests using actual land-use data, the MESSP approach emerged as the clear winner, in terms of fit and computing times. Results from all three models offer consistent interpretation of parameter estimates, with locations farther away from the regional central business district (CBD) and closer to roadways being more prone to (mostly residential) development (as expected). Again, the MESSP model offered the greatest computing-time savings benefits, but all three specifications yielded similar marginal effects estimates, showing how a focus on the spatial interactions and net (direct plus indirect) effects across observational units is more important than a focus on slope-parameter estimates when properly analyzing spatial data.

Keywords: Spatial autoregressive probit model; Matrix exponential spatial specification; Distance decay; Bayesian estimation; Land use change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Transport and Land Use is currently edited by David M. Levinson

More articles in The Journal of Transport and Land Use from Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Arlene Mathison ().

Page updated 2018-11-07
Handle: RePEc:ris:jtralu:0115