Measuring Factor Substitution with Neoclassical Models: An Experimental Evaluation

Raymond Kopp and V. Smith

Bell Journal of Economics, 1980, vol. 11, issue 2, 631-655

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the performance of neoclassical cost functions in estimating input substitution. In contrast to earlier studies, this analysis assumes that the "true" technology is represented by each of three large-scale, engineering, process analysis models. Experimental methods are used to evaluate the effect of the definition of factor inputs, the characteristics of the technologies, and the presence of residual discharge constraints on measures of input association. The findings support the use of approximate significance tests as an integral part of the interpretation of the neoclassical estimates. They suggest that input aggregation reduces the ability of neoclassical methods to isolate input associations. Finally, they indicate that residual discharge constraints can, if ignored in modeling, distort measured substitution relations.

Date: 1980
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0361-915X%2819802 ... O%3B2-U&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rje:bellje:v:11:y:1980:i:autumn:p:631-655

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://editorialexp ... i-bin/rje_online.cgi

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Bell Journal of Economics from The RAND Corporation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().