Peak-Load Pricing: Some Further Remarks

Oliver Williamson

Bell Journal of Economics, 1974, vol. 5, issue 1, 223-228

Abstract: This note takes issue with the "reconciliation" proposed by George Wilson between the Steiner and Williamson formulations of the peak-load pricing problem. Wilson respecifies weights without simultaneously addressing himself to the question of expressing output units in consonant terms. This procedure is incorrect, whence the error associated with the original Steiner formulation cannot be overcome in this way. Steiner's interpretation of his results in price discrimination rather than marginal cost pricing terms is briefly discussed. Reasons for preferring the marginal cost pricing interpretation are offered.

Date: 1974
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0005-8556%2819742 ... O%3B2-Z&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rje:bellje:v:5:y:1974:i:spring:p:223-228

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://editorialexp ... i-bin/rje_online.cgi

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Bell Journal of Economics from The RAND Corporation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().