Line of Business Reporting and Security Prices: An Analysis of an SEC Disclosure Rule: Comment

Richard R. Simonds and Daniel W. Collins

Bell Journal of Economics, 1978, vol. 9, issue 2, 646-658

Abstract: In an earlier article in this Journal, Horwitz and Kolodny reported that imposition of the SEC's line of business reporting requirements did not affect investors' assessments of the riskiness of multisegment firms. We suggest that shortcomings in their sample-selection and hypothesis-testing procedures may have led to this result. Our empirical analyses indicate that the LOBUR disclosure did convey useful information to investors and that the average effect was a downward shift in their assessment of a multisegment firm's market riskiness.

Date: 1978
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0361-915X%2819782 ... O%3B2-A&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rje:bellje:v:9:y:1978:i:autumn:p:646-658

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://editorialexp ... i-bin/rje_online.cgi

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Bell Journal of Economics from The RAND Corporation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().