Shifting Plaintiffs' Fees versus Increasing Damage Awards

Louis Kaplow

RAND Journal of Economics, 1993, vol. 24, issue 4, 625-630

Abstract: Shifting victorious plaintiffs' fees to defendants and increasing damage awards are alternative ways to achieve similar results: increasing plaintiffs' incentives to sue and raising defendants' expected payments. This article shows that relying on higher damage awards is more efficient than shifting plaintiffs' fees. The reason is that fee shifting is more valuable for plaintiffs with higher litigation costs. Thus, it is possible to substitute higher damage awards for fee shifting in a manner that leaves deterrence unaffected while eliminating the suits of plaintiffs with the highest litigation costs.

Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0741-6261%2819932 ... O%3B2-A&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: Shifting Plaintiffs' Fees versus Increasing Damage Awards (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rje:randje:v:24:y:1993:i:winter:p:625-630

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://editorialexp ... i-bin/rje_online.cgi

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in RAND Journal of Economics from The RAND Corporation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().