Inefficiency of the Subgame Optimal Entry Regulation

Jaehong Kim

RAND Journal of Economics, 1997, vol. 28, issue 1, 25-36

Abstract: The literature on excess entry shows that the free-entry equilibrium number of firms may be greater than is socially optimal, and proposes government entry regulation as a remedy. This article tries to show that such a policy recommendation is misleading. A two-period, three-person entry game model, which explicitly includes second-best government, shows that entry regulation aimed at preventing excess entry actually induces the incumbent to behave strategically against the government and makes the final outcome socially suboptimal compared to cases in which there is no government intervention. Entry regulation is subgame optimal; however, it is globally suboptimal.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0741-6261%2819972 ... O%3B2-F&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rje:randje:v:28:y:1997:i:spring:p:25-36

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://editorialexp ... i-bin/rje_online.cgi

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in RAND Journal of Economics from The RAND Corporation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().