Are Mega-Mergers Anticompetitive? Evidence from the First Great Merger Wave

Ajeyo Banerjee and Edwin Eckard

RAND Journal of Economics, 1998, vol. 29, issue 4, 803-827

Abstract: In the first time-event analysis of the great merger wave of 1897-1903, we find that the consolidations created value for merger participants of 12% to 18%. We next find that the competitors suffered significant value losses inconsistent with conventional monopoly behavior (i.e., trust-induced output reductions and price increases). This result might be explained by apprehensions of trust predation rather than expected efficiency, but further analysis suggests that this is unlikely. Revelation of trust membership or prior stock market mispricing are also unlikely alternative explanations. On balance, therefore, the evidence indicates that these mergers were generally motivated by more efficient operations, rather than monopoly power.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (66)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0741-6261%2819982 ... O%3B2-Y&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rje:randje:v:29:y:1998:i:winter:p:803-827

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://editorialexp ... i-bin/rje_online.cgi

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in RAND Journal of Economics from The RAND Corporation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().