Less Subjectivity in Setting Cut Scores: A Novel Approach

Jean Pierre Atanas

Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 2013, vol. 4, issue 4, 109-118

Abstract: Recently, standard-setting cut scores and assessment techniques became of major concerns for many organizational institutions worldwide. A cut score separates one performance level from another. It differentiates between those who pass and those who fail. They may vary according to the recommendations of policy makers and stakeholders. Passing scores were suggested by many methods on numerous types of tests: certification tests and educational tests. Most of these standard setting methods rely on panelists’ subjectivity in ordering items by level of difficulty. This paper presents a simple approach to assessments by minimizing considerably panelists’ subjectivity. Items are classified in levels of difficulties rather than in an increasing order in most of the standard methods. This novel approach respond to three main criteria: practicality, wide range of applicability and maximum agreement with the empirical data. Provisional and operational cut scores were derived and discussed.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jevr/article/view/108/108 (application/pdf)
https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jevr/article/view/108 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnd:arjevr:v:4:y:2013:i:4:p:109-118

DOI: 10.22610/jevr.v4i4.108

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Education and Vocational Research from AMH International
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Muhammad Tayyab ().