The Legality of Vertical Restraints by the Rule of Reason and the Character of the Specific Investments

Правомерность вертикальных ограничивающих соглашений с позиции "взвешенного подхода" и характер специфических инвестиций

Maria Agamirova and Nataliya Dzagurova

Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, 2016, vol. 6, 122-137

Abstract: The underinvestment in the specific assets due to the “hold up” is one of the key issues in the theory of the firm. Till the very end of the twentieth century discussing the “hold up” problem researchers considered only the so-called “selfish” relation-specific investments. But later their attention was switched to the analysis of another specific investments type, named “cooperative” or “cross” investments, which is much more risky than the selfish investments. Besides that, the riskiness of such investments depends on their specifity degree — the specific investments can be partly specific or full specific. In its turn, the degree of specifity determined by the partners’ ability to benefit from selfish or cooperative specific investments in contacts with “alternative” contractors. If such gains equal zero, that specific investments (cooperative or selfish) are full specific to the “main” partner. Respectively, if the gains from partnership with “alternative” contractors are more than zero, that such specific investments are partly specific to the “main” partner. Unfortunately the present regulatory documents, determining the application the rule of reason, don’t take into account the character of specific investments. The negative consequences of such approach are illustrated in the first part of the article, where the court’s decision in case of Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmetique SAS (PFDC) v. President de l’Autorite de la concurrence, Ministre de l’Economie, de l’Industrie et de l’Emploi is analyzed. The second part of the article is dedicated to the discussion of possible solutions of this problem.

Keywords: cooperative relation-specific investments; vertical restraints; antitrust; rule of reason; e-commerce (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B52 E22 G11 K (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1666.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1666

Access Statistics for this article

Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy is currently edited by Vladimir Mau

More articles in Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RANEPA maintainer ().