The Cameralism of Peter I’s Administrative Reforms: Pro et Contra

Камерализм административных реформ Петра I: pro et contra

Raskov, Danila (Расков, Данила) (danila.raskov@gmail.com)
Additional contact information
Raskov, Danila (Расков, Данила): University of Helsinki

Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, 2023, vol. 1, 78-105

Abstract: The common view that Peter the Great’s administrative reforms were largely borrowed from primarily Swedish European practices and resembled the seventeenth-century kinds of governance associated with cameralism provides this study’s starting point. The article describes how the reform process that introduced the collegia unfolded and amounted to a true bureaucratic revolution with fully elaborated paperwork and regulations. Reconstructing the legislative processes of these reforms helps in understanding the extent to which they were borrowed and the way they differed from European prototypes. The article’s main objective is to show the variety of methods employed to argue for cameralist features in Peter’s administrative reforms, as well as to identify the advantages and disadvantages of a broad and narrow way of interpreting them. The broad interpretation of cameralism offers discourse about its striking resemblance to the spirit and tone of modernization but does not invoke any specific influences. This logic of historical elective affinity between phenomena is in the end too simplistic and may result in invalid conclusions. The paper maintains that it is more valuable to identify causal relationships and direct paths of influence. An example of this approach can be seen in Claes Peterson’s historical reconstruction, which clearly demonstrates how the ideas of the seventeenth-century cameralists Schroeder and Seckendorff were applied in Sweden’s regulations. This is the kind of diligent work that can firmly establish a connection between cameralism and the reforms. Broad generalizations capture only the most general features of the era and render the content of the term “cameralism” meaningless.

Keywords: collegiate reform; General Regulation; cameralists; well-ordered state; bureaucracy. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B11 N4 P4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep2304.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep2304

Access Statistics for this article

Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy is currently edited by Vladimir Mau

More articles in Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RANEPA maintainer (repository@ranepa.ru).